To convert SEER2 to old SEER, multiply by 1.047. To convert SEER to SEER2, divide by 1.047. For example, 15.2 SEER2 equals approximately 15.9 SEER, and 16 SEER equals approximately 15.3 SEER2. The conversion isn't perfectly uniform across all equipment types — variable-speed systems may see a smaller gap — but 1.047 is the accepted industry approximation.
This page provides a comprehensive conversion chart, step-by-step examples, and conversions for all updated metrics (EER/EER2 and HSPF/HSPF2).
SEER2 to SEER Conversion Chart
| SEER2 (New) | SEER (Old Equivalent) | SEER2 (New) | SEER (Old Equivalent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.0 | 18.8 | 18.0 | 18.8 |
| 19.0 | 19.9 | 19.0 | 19.9 |
| 20.0 | 20.9 | 20.0 | 20.9 |
| 21.0 | 22.0 | 21.0 | 22.0 |
| 22.0 | 23.0 | 22.0 | 23.0 |
| 23.0 | 24.1 | 23.0 | 24.1 |
| 24.0 | 25.1 | 24.0 | 25.1 |
| 25.0 | 26.2 | 25.0 | 26.2 |
| 26.0 | 27.2 | 26.0 | 27.2 |
| — | — | — | — |
Key minimums in both standards:
- North AC minimum: 13.4 SEER2 = 14.0 SEER
- South AC minimum: 14.3 SEER2 = 15.0 SEER
- ENERGY STAR AC: 15.2 SEER2 = 15.9 SEER
- Tax credit AC: 17.5 SEER2 = 18.3 SEER
Conversion Formulas
SEER / SEER2
SEER2 to SEER: SEER = SEER2 x 1.047
SEER to SEER2: SEER2 = SEER / 1.047
EER / EER2
EER2 to EER: EER = EER2 x 1.047
EER to EER2: EER2 = EER / 1.047
HSPF / HSPF2
The HSPF conversion is less precise because heating tests involve defrost cycles and strip heat:
HSPF to HSPF2: HSPF2 is approximately HSPF x 0.85 (rough approximation)
HSPF2 to HSPF: HSPF is approximately HSPF2 / 0.85
The HSPF conversion is less reliable than SEER/EER conversions. The heating test involves supplemental electric strips and defrost cycles that interact differently with higher static pressure. The 0.85 factor is a ballpark. For precise HSPF2 values, check the manufacturer's AHRI certificate for the specific model.
EER to EER2 Conversion Chart
| EER (Old) | EER2 (New) | EER (Old) | EER2 (New) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.0 | 12.4 | 13.0 | 12.4 |
| 13.5 | 12.9 | 13.5 | 12.9 |
| 14.0 | 13.4 | 14.0 | 13.4 |
| 14.5 | 13.9 | 14.5 | 13.9 |
| 15.0 | 14.3 | 15.0 | 14.3 |
| 16.0 | 15.3 | 16.0 | 15.3 |
HSPF to HSPF2 Conversion Chart (Approximate)
| HSPF (Old) | HSPF2 (New, approx) | HSPF (Old) | HSPF2 (New, approx) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0 | 9.4 | 11.0 | 9.4 |
| 11.5 | 9.8 | 11.5 | 9.8 |
| 12.0 | 10.2 | 12.0 | 10.2 |
| 12.5 | 10.6 | 12.5 | 10.6 |
| 13.0 | 11.1 | 13.0 | 11.1 |
| 13.5 | 11.5 | 13.5 | 11.5 |
| 14.0 | 11.9 | 14.0 | 11.9 |
Step-by-Step Conversion Examples
Example 1: Your old AC is rated 16 SEER. What's the SEER2 equivalent?
SEER2 = 16 / 1.047 = 15.3 SEER2
A new 15.3 SEER2 unit is approximately equivalent in efficiency to your old 16 SEER unit.
Example 2: A new AC is rated 18 SEER2. What would it have been rated under the old standard?
SEER = 18 x 1.047 = 18.8 SEER
This unit would have been labeled 18.8 SEER before the 2023 transition.
Example 3: You're comparing your 12 EER window AC to a new 11.5 EER2 model. Which is more efficient?
Convert old EER to EER2: 12 / 1.047 = 11.5 EER2
They're essentially identical in efficiency. The new unit just uses a tougher test standard.
Why the Conversion Isn't Perfectly Uniform
The 1.047 factor is an average. The actual SEER-to-SEER2 ratio varies by equipment type:
| Equipment Type | Typical Conversion Factor | Why It Varies |
|---|---|---|
| Single-speed with PSC motor | 1.05-1.06 | PSC motors are most affected by higher static pressure |
| Two-stage with ECM motor | 1.04-1.05 | ECM motors adapt to higher pressure more efficiently |
| Variable-speed with ECM motor | 1.03-1.05 | Best motors handle pressure increases well |
| Mini-split (ductless) | 1.02-1.04 | Minimal duct-related static pressure impact |
PSC (permanent split capacitor) blower motors are the most affected because they can't adjust their speed when resistance increases. ECM (electronically commutated motor) blowers ramp up to maintain airflow, consuming more electricity but with less efficiency degradation.
The Physics Behind the 1.047 Factor
The 1.047 SEER-to-SEER2 approximation exists because the DOE test procedure changed on January 1, 2023 — the physical unit did not. What changed is the external static pressure the equipment must overcome during the efficiency test.
Under the old SEER test, the indoor blower was tested at 0.1 in. w.c. of external static pressure — a very low resistance that no realistic residential duct system produces. Under the new SEER2 test (DOE 10 CFR Part 430 Subpart B Appendix M1), external static pressure was raised to 0.5 in. w.c. — much closer to the resistance typical ducted systems actually present.
At higher static pressure, the blower motor draws more power to move the same air volume. The extra motor draw is real; the equipment's cooling capacity isn't reduced, but the ratio of BTU-per-watt-hour drops. That drop shows up as a lower SEER2 number for the same unit.
The 4.7% average reduction is DOE's estimate for typical residential central AC and heat pumps across the equipment class. Individual units may shift more or less depending on their blower motor characteristics — a variable-speed ECM blower handles the higher static pressure more gracefully than a fixed-speed PSC motor, so a variable-speed unit's SEER-to-SEER2 ratio may be closer to 1:1, while a fixed-speed PSC unit's may exceed the 1.047 average.
When to Use Each Conversion Direction
SEER → SEER2 (existing unit rated in old scale, need current-code equivalent):
- Repair-vs-replace decisions on 2015–2022 equipment where the nameplate shows SEER but the local code minimum is now written in SEER2
- Rebate-program eligibility checks where the program threshold is written in SEER2 but you have old paperwork
- Comparing your existing system to what current-code new equipment would deliver
SEER2 → SEER (new-equipment quote in SEER2, need to compare against older stored data):
- Comparing 2026 new-install pricing against 2020s repair-cost records where the reference SEER was in the old scale
- Historical energy-savings estimation where your baseline utility data uses SEER
- Interpreting older technical documents that list target efficiencies in SEER
The AHRI-Certified Rating Is Authoritative
The 1.047 factor is a rule-of-thumb approximation, not an exact conversion. For any specific model that matters (a warranty claim, a code-compliance letter, a rebate application), look up the actual AHRI-certified rating in both scales on the AHRI Directory (ahridirectory.org). Many manufacturers publish both SEER and SEER2 for units certified during the 2023 transition period; for units certified before the transition, only SEER is available and the 1.047 approximation is the best you can do.
Practical Guidance for Comparisons
When comparing equipment across standards, always convert to the same scale. If you're shopping for new equipment, everything will be in SEER2. If you're comparing a new purchase to your existing system, convert your old SEER to SEER2 first.
Don't mix metrics in the same comparison. A 15 SEER2 unit is actually slightly more efficient than a 15 SEER unit, even though the numbers match. Converting reveals the truth: 15 SEER2 equals approximately 15.7 SEER.
Key Takeaways
- SEER to SEER2: divide by 1.047. SEER2 to SEER: multiply by 1.047.
- EER to EER2 uses the same 1.047 factor.
- HSPF to HSPF2: multiply by roughly 0.85 (less precise due to heating test complexities).
- 16 SEER = 15.3 SEER2. 15.2 SEER2 = 15.9 SEER. These are the most common conversions.
- Variable-speed systems see a smaller gap (1.03-1.05x) than single-speed with PSC motors (1.05-1.06x).
- Always convert to the same standard before comparing — don't compare SEER numbers to SEER2 numbers directly.
- For exact values, check the manufacturer's AHRI certificate for the specific indoor/outdoor unit combination.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. 15.2 SEER2 is actually more efficient than 15.2 SEER. Converting to the same standard: 15.2 SEER2 equals about 15.9 SEER. The SEER2 test is harder, so the same number represents better real-world performance.
Sources & References
Related Articles
CADR Rating Explained: How to Choose an Air Purifier by CADR
guide • 8 min read
EER Chart for Air Conditioners (Good, Average, Excellent)
reference • 8 min read
What Is EER Rating? Energy Efficiency Ratio Explained
explainer • 7 min read
EER vs SEER: What's the Difference Between These Ratings?
explainer • 6 min read