CEER (Combined Energy Efficiency Ratio) is the efficiency metric for window and portable air conditioners that accounts for both active cooling efficiency and standby power consumption. It replaced the standard EER for room ACs in 2014 because window units draw measurable electricity even when they're plugged in but not actively cooling. A good CEER for a typical 8,000-12,000 BTU window AC is 12.0 or higher, which meets ENERGY STAR certification.
If you're shopping for a window AC, CEER is the number on the EnergyGuide label. Higher CEER means lower electricity bills over the cooling season.
The CEER Formula
CEER = Cooling Capacity (BTU/h) / (Active Power (W) + Standby Power Adjustment (W))
The standby power adjustment accounts for electricity consumed when the unit is in off mode or standby mode (plugged in but compressor not running). The DOE formula weights active and standby power based on assumed annual hours in each mode.
In practice, CEER is slightly lower than EER for the same unit because standby power adds to the denominator. For a unit with 800W active power and 2W standby, the CEER might be 0.1-0.3 points lower than the EER.
Standby power is small but adds up. A window AC drawing 2 watts in standby for 6,000 hours per year (the hours it's not actively cooling) uses 12 kWh — about $2 per year. For larger units with digital controls and WiFi, standby draw can reach 5-10W, adding $5-$10 annually. CEER captures this cost that EER missed.
CEER Requirements by Capacity
Federal minimum CEER varies by the unit's cooling capacity. Smaller units must meet higher CEER minimums because their compressors are proportionally less efficient:
| Capacity Range (BTU/h) | Federal Min CEER | ENERGY STAR CEER | Louvered Sides or Not |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5,000-5,999 | 11.0 | 12.1 | Without louvered sides |
| 6,000-7,999 | 11.0 | 12.1 | Without louvered sides |
| 8,000-10,999 | 10.5 | 12.1 | Without louvered sides |
| 11,000-13,999 | 9.9 | 11.3 | Without louvered sides |
| 14,000-19,999 | 9.5 | 10.8 | Without louvered sides |
| 20,000-24,999 | 9.0 | 10.0 | Without louvered sides |
| 25,000+ | 8.5 | 9.8 | Without louvered sides |
Window ACs with louvered sides have slightly different minimums because the louvered design allows more outdoor air to cool the condenser. Check the specific category for your unit type on the ENERGY STAR product finder.
What's a Good CEER for a Window AC?
| CEER Range | Rating | What to Expect | Annual Cost (8K BTU, 1,000 hrs, $0.16/kWh) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Below 10 | Below Average | Meets minimum for larger units only | $128+ |
| 10-11 | Average | Meets federal minimum for most sizes | $116-$128 |
| 11-12 | Good | Above average, approaching ENERGY STAR | $107-$116 |
| 12-13 | Very Good (ENERGY STAR) | Meets ENERGY STAR for most sizes | $98-$107 |
| 13-14 | Excellent | Top performers, usually inverter models | $91-$98 |
| 14+ | Premium | Best available, rare in window units | Below $91 |
CEER vs EER: What Changed
| Feature | EER (Old) | CEER (Current) |
|---|---|---|
| Effective | Before 2014 for room ACs | 2014 onwards for room ACs |
| Standby Power | Not included | Included in calculation |
| Typical Difference | Baseline | 0.1-0.3 points lower than EER |
| What It Captures | Active cooling only | Active cooling + standby draw |
| Used For | Central ACs (now EER2) | Window and portable ACs only |
The difference between EER and CEER is small for most units (0.1-0.3 points) because standby power is typically only 1-10W compared to 500-1,500W of active cooling power. But across millions of installed window ACs, the standby draw adds up to significant national energy consumption.
Top Window ACs by CEER (2026)
| Model | BTU | CEER | Noise (dB) | Features | Price Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midea U-Shaped 8K | 8,000 | 15.0 | 42 dB | Inverter, WiFi, ultra-quiet | $300-$370 |
| Midea U-Shaped 12K | 12,000 | 14.5 | 44 dB | Inverter, WiFi, ultra-quiet | $370-$450 |
| LG LW8023IVSM | 8,000 | 14.7 | 44 dB | Inverter, WiFi, dual inverter | $350-$420 |
| LG LW1022IVSM | 10,000 | 14.0 | 44 dB | Inverter, WiFi | $400-$500 |
| Frigidaire Gallery GHWQ083WC1 | 8,000 | 13.0 | 45 dB | Inverter, WiFi | $330-$400 |
| GE Profile PHC08LY | 8,000 | 12.5 | 42 dB | Inverter, WiFi, ultra-quiet | $350-$420 |
| Friedrich Chill Premier CCF08A10A | 8,000 | 12.1 | 50 dB | Standard, WiFi | $280-$350 |
Inverter window ACs dominate the high-CEER charts because they modulate compressor speed based on demand, similar to how variable-speed central ACs achieve high SEER2. The Midea U-Shaped inverter series consistently leads in both CEER and noise performance.
Calculating Window AC Operating Costs
Annual Cost = (BTU/h / CEER) x Annual Cooling Hours x ($/kWh / 1,000)
Example: An 8,000 BTU window AC with 12.1 CEER running 1,000 hours at $0.16/kWh.
Power draw = 8,000 / 12.1 = 661 watts
Annual kWh = 661 x 1,000 / 1,000 = 661 kWh
Annual cost = 661 x $0.16 = $106
The same unit at 10.0 CEER: 800W, 800 kWh, $128/year. The higher CEER saves $22/year.
Window AC vs Central AC Efficiency
It's tempting to compare window AC CEER to central AC SEER2, but they measure different things:
| Metric | Window AC CEER 12 | Central AC SEER2 16 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| What It Measures | Full-load + standby | Seasonal average (part + full load) | Different test methods |
| COP Equivalent | 3.52 (at full load) | 4.69 (seasonal average) | Not directly comparable |
| Includes Duct Losses | N/A (no ducts) | No (measured at unit) | Central AC loses 20-30% in ducts |
| Real Delivered COP | ~3.5 | ~3.3-3.8 (after duct losses) | Closer than ratings suggest |
After accounting for duct losses, a 12 CEER window unit and a 16 SEER2 central system deliver similar actual efficiency to the rooms they serve. The central system's advantage is whole-home coverage and better comfort control.
Portable AC CEER Considerations
Portable air conditioners also carry CEER ratings, but their real-world efficiency is significantly lower than window units for two reasons:
Single-hose portable ACs create negative pressure that pulls warm outdoor air into the room through gaps around doors and windows. This "infiltration load" isn't captured by CEER testing. Dual-hose models partially solve this problem but are less common.
The exhaust hose itself radiates heat back into the room. A 4-5 inch exhaust hose running at 120-140 degrees F through a room adds a measurable heat load.
A portable AC rated at 10 CEER may deliver effective cooling equivalent to only 6-7 CEER once infiltration and hose losses are factored in.
If you have the option, choose a window AC over a portable AC. Window units are consistently 30-50% more efficient in real-world use due to the inherent design advantages of sealing against the window frame and rejecting heat directly outdoors.
DOE-Adjusted BTU for Portable ACs (Post-2017 Rule)
The DOE test procedure at 10 CFR 430 Subpart B Appendix CC (effective for portable ACs manufactured on or after January 10, 2017) introduced a second cooling-capacity number that appears on product labels alongside the older ASHRAE 128-based rating. Manufacturers must now publish a DOE-adjusted BTU/h value that subtracts two losses the ASHRAE test ignored: infiltration of hot outdoor air pulled in through gaps to replace the air the exhaust hose sends outside, and heat conduction through the hose wall back into the conditioned space.
The adjustment magnitude depends on hose configuration. For single-hose portables, DOE-adjusted capacity is typically 60-80% of the ASHRAE nameplate; dual-hose designs, which pull combustion-style makeup air from outdoors instead of the room, retain roughly 85-95% of the ASHRAE value. Those ranges are the ballparks commonly cited in manufacturer literature filed under the DOE rule, and they explain why the same physical box can carry two very different BTU numbers.
A practical implication: a portable AC marketed as "14,000 BTU (ASHRAE) / 9,500 BTU (DOE-adjusted)" is not equivalent to a 14,000 BTU window unit. The window unit delivers its full nameplate cooling into the room because the entire condenser and hot-side airflow sit outdoors. When sizing a portable against a Manual J load, always use the DOE-adjusted number — the ASHRAE figure overstates delivered cooling by 20-40%.
Reading the EnergyGuide Label
The yellow EnergyGuide label on every new room and portable AC is required by the FTC under 16 CFR Part 305. It packs four pieces of information into a standardized layout, and knowing where to look shortens shopping considerably.
- Top band: manufacturer, model number, and cooling capacity in BTU/h. For portables, this is where the DOE-adjusted number appears; the ASHRAE figure is often relegated to the spec sheet.
- Center: the CEER value for that model, plotted against a horizontal range showing the lowest and highest CEER among similar-capacity units currently on the market. A tick mark shows where this specific model falls on that range.
- Estimated yearly electricity cost: a dollar figure computed at DOE-assumed annual operating hours and a national-average residential electricity price the FTC updates periodically (recent updates have placed the assumed rate near the mid-teens of cents per kWh).
- Bottom disclaimer: a reminder that actual cost varies with usage, climate, and local electricity price.
The estimated-cost figure is a comparative benchmark, not a household forecast. A unit labeled at a modest annual cost under DOE assumptions can easily run two to four times higher in a hot-humid climate where the AC operates most of the day for six or more months. Treat the label's dollar figure the way you'd treat an EPA fuel-economy sticker: excellent for comparing models, unreliable as a personal budget line.
What CEER Doesn't Capture
CEER is measured in a psychrometric chamber under tightly controlled indoor and outdoor conditions specified in 10 CFR 430 Appendix F (for room ACs). Real installations introduce losses the test cannot see, and those losses often matter more than a one-point CEER difference between two models.
- Sleeve and frame leakage. A window unit rattling in an oversized sash gap leaks conditioned air outward and pulls warm air in around the chassis. Foam side-panels, closed-cell weather strip along the sash contact, and a well-sealed accordion filler are the low-cost fix; without them, sensible cooling delivered to the room can drop noticeably even though the compressor draws its rated wattage.
- Warm cavity exposure. When a window AC's rear condenser section sits inside an unconditioned attic knee wall, garage bump-out, or sun-baked porch enclosure, the "outdoor" air the condenser rejects heat into is hotter than the true ambient the DOE test assumes. Higher condensing temperature raises head pressure and cuts capacity.
- Coil fouling. Dust and pollen on the outdoor condenser fins and lint on the indoor evaporator both raise head pressure and lower airflow. A 5-15% efficiency loss by year three without cleaning is a commonly cited industry ballpark; the exact number depends on environment and filter discipline.
CEER remains the right comparative metric when shopping. Once the unit is in the wall, install quality, seasonal maintenance, and honest sizing determine whether the rated efficiency actually shows up on the electric bill.
Key Takeaways
- CEER = cooling BTU/h divided by (active watts + standby watts). It replaced EER for window/portable ACs in 2014.
- Good CEER for most window ACs: 12.0+ (ENERGY STAR level). Premium inverter models reach 14-15.
- CEER is typically 0.1-0.3 points lower than EER for the same unit due to standby power inclusion.
- Federal minimums range from 8.5 to 11.0 CEER depending on unit capacity (smaller units have higher minimums).
- Inverter window ACs (Midea U-Shaped, LG Dual Inverter) lead in CEER and noise performance.
- Don't compare CEER to SEER2 directly — they measure different things under different conditions.
- Portable ACs have misleadingly high CEER — real-world efficiency is 30-50% lower due to hose and infiltration losses.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEER is similar to EER but also includes standby power consumption in the calculation. CEER values are typically 0.1-0.3 points lower than EER for the same unit. CEER is used for window and portable ACs, while EER2 is used for central air conditioners.
Sources & References
Related Articles
CADR Rating Explained: How to Choose an Air Purifier by CADR
guide • 8 min read
EER Chart for Air Conditioners (Good, Average, Excellent)
reference • 8 min read
What Is EER Rating? Energy Efficiency Ratio Explained
explainer • 7 min read
EER vs SEER: What's the Difference Between These Ratings?
explainer • 6 min read